[cups.general] [patch] IPP_PORT setting

[Tim Waugh]

On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 08:44:17AM -0400, Michael Sweet wrote:

> Hmm, the purpose of this was to allow for filters that needed to
> communicate with the scheduler to do so; changing it will prevent
> it.

Okay, didn't realise that.

> I would say we probably want to use ippSetPort(IPP_PORT) in the
> IPP backend instead; that will get the behavior you desire without
> impacting the filters. 

Yes, this sounds like the best solution.

Thanks,
Tim.
*/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cups.org/pipermail/cups/attachments/20040810/ea00b567/attachment.bin>