[cups.development] [RFE] STR #2142: please implement BrowseBind or similar option

Alexey Toptygin alexeyt at freeshell.org
Mon Dec 11 08:15:25 PST 2006


On Mon, 11 Dec 2006, Michael Sweet wrote:

> [STR Closed w/o Resolution]
>
> Given the difficulties with implementing this efficiently (we'd need to
> create multiple browse sockets and handle routing errors for packets sent
> on the wrong interfaces), it is unlikely we will ever add support for
> BrowseBind or BrowseListen.

I wasn't suggesting you support multiple browse bindings, only that you 
change the one you have to optionally bind to something other than 
INADDR_ANY. That is possible without a lot of work, no?

 			Alexey





More information about the cups mailing list