[cups.general] %%PageBoundingBox in DSC-conforming PostScript
Till Kamppeter
till.kamppeter at gmail.com
Mon Jan 26 09:51:57 PST 2009
Helge Blischke wrote:
>
> I think it is a Ghostscript bug. AFAIK, the "%%PageBoundingBox" belongs
> to the
> page header comments, whereas the stuff between the "%%BeginPageSetup" and
> "%%EndPageSetup" comment lines is thought to contain PS code that
> defines the
> deviations ov the currend page from the general setup as defined between
> "%%BeginSetup" and "%%EndSetup".
>
> I'd suggest to file a Ghostscript bug.
>
> By the way, how does gs 8.63 behave here?
Thank you very much for your answer.
I do not know the GS 8.63 behavior, but for 8.64 I reported the problem
and even though we are in code freeze for GS 8.64 and they have accepted
my patch to fix it.
As the DSC specs do not clearly forbid DSC comments inside
"%%BeginPageSetup" and "%%EndPageSetup", I have also reported a CUPS bug:
http://www.cups.org/str.php?L3075
Till
More information about the cups
mailing list