make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `printers.o'

[Robert Davis]

New job -- new project -- first encounter with CUPS.

I have v1.4.4-v1.4.6 on a Solaris 10 09/10 dev M3000 box, little to no security. Following instructions I run:

./configure --prefix={new basedir} --disable-gssapi --disable-ldap

No problems are encountered so I run:

make (this is GCC 3.4.3 and PATH already set)

V.1.4.4 and v.1.4.5 compile completely, with occasional warnings.  V.1.4.6 kicks out this error and terminates:

Compiling auth.c...
Compiling banners.c...
Compiling cert.c...
Compiling classes.c...
Compiling client.c...
Compiling conf.c...
Compiling dirsvc.c...
dirsvc.c: In function `ldap_connect':
dirsvc.c:1338: warning: implicit declaration of function `PORT_GetError'
dirsvc.c:1104: warning: unused variable `bv'
Compiling env.c...
Compiling main.c...
Compiling ipp.c...
Compiling listen.c...
Compiling job.c...
Compiling log.c...
Compiling network.c...
Compiling policy.c...
Compiling printers.c...
printers.c: In function `cupsdCreateCommonData':
printers.c:493: error: too few arguments to function `statfs'
printers.c: In function `add_printer_filter':
printers.c:3691: warning: unsigned int format, mode_t arg (arg 6)
printers.c:3718: warning: unsigned int format, mode_t arg (arg 6)
*** Error code 1
The following command caused the error:
gcc  -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -fPIC -Os -g -I.. -D_CUPS_SOURCE  -DOPENSSL_DISABLE_OLD_DES_SUPPORT  -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_THREAD_SAFE -D_REENTRANT -D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS  -c -o printers.o printers.c
make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `printers.o'
Current working directory /h/CUPS_1.4.6/cups-1.4.6/scheduler
*** Error code 1
The following command caused the error:
for dir in cups filter backend berkeley cgi-bin driver locale man monitor  notifier ppdc scheduler systemv test    conf data doc examples fonts templates; do\
        echo Making all in $dir... ;\
        (cd $dir ; make  all ) || exit 1;\
done
make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `all'

Thoughts?  Thanks in advance . . .